On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 11:10, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 8:22 AM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_subscription.h > +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_subscription.h > @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ typedef struct Subscription > * skipped */ > char *name; /* Name of the subscription */ > Oid owner; /* Oid of the subscription owner */ > + bool ownersuperuser; /* Is the subscription owner a superuser? */ > bool enabled; /* Indicates if the subscription is enabled */ > bool binary; /* Indicates if the subscription wants data in > * binary format */ > > We normally don't change the exposed structure in back branches as > that poses a risk of breaking extensions. In this case, if we want, we > can try to squeeze some padding space or we even can fix it without > introducing a new member. OTOH, it is already debatable whether to fix > it in back branches, so we can even commit this patch just in HEAD.
I too feel we can commit this patch only in HEAD. Regards, Vignesh
