On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:47:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: >> ... and it looks like some of the back-branches are failing for Windows. >> I'm assuming this is because c290e79 was only back-patched to v15. My >> first instinct is just to back-patch that one all the way to v11, but maybe >> there's an alternative involving #ifdef WIN32. Are there any concerns with >> back-patching c290e79? > > Sounds fine to me.
Thanks, done. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
