Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2/4/18 13:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> + 22013 E ERRCODE_INVALID_PRECEDING_FOLLOWING_SIZE
>> invalid_preceding_following_size
> I was checking the new error codes in PostgreSQL 11 and came across
> this. The original name in the SQL standard is
> INVALID_PRECEDING_OR_FOLLOWING_SIZE_IN_WINDOW_FUNCTION
> which is reasonable to abbreviate, but is there a reason why we lost the
> "or"?
It seemed like a reasonable abbreviation to me. If you disagree,
feel free to change it.
regards, tom lane
