On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 1:25 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > This change would mean that policies added by a user after the extension > > is created would just be lost by a pg_dump/reload, doesn't it? > > Yes. But I'd say that's unsupported, just like making other ad-hoc > changes to extension objects is unsupported (and the effects will be > lost on dump/reload). We specifically have support for user-added > ACLs, and that's good, but don't claim that we have support for > doing the same with policies.
Is this approach backportable? (Adding Aleks to CC -- Timescale may want to double-check that the new proposal still works for them.) Thanks, --Jacob
