Hello. I found the following message recently introduced in pg_upgrade:
> pg_log(PG_VERBOSE, "slot_name: \"%s\", plugin: \"%s\", > two_phase: %s", > slot_info->slotname, > slot_info->plugin, > slot_info->two_phase ? "true" : "false"); If the labels correspond to the struct member names, the first label ought to be "slotname". If not, all labels of this type, including those adjucent, should have a more natural spelling. What do you think about this? regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
