On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:32:28AM -0600, Roberto Mello wrote: > I realize the original use of "touch" is a valid shortcut for what I > suggest above, however that will be less clear for the not-so-un*x-inclined > users of Postgres, while for some it'll be downright confusing, IMHO. It > also provides the advantage of being crystal clear on what needs to be done > to fix the problem.
Indeed, "touch" may be better in this path if we'd throw an ERROR to enforce a given policy, and that's more consistent with the rest of the area. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
