On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:03:52AM +0000, Hou, Zhijie wrote: > Hi > > In /src/backend/executor/nodeAgg.c > > I found the following comment still use work mem, > Since hash_mem has been introduced, Is it more accurate to use hash_mem here ? > > @@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ hash_agg_set_limits(double hashentrysize, double > input_groups, int used_bits, > /* > * Don't set the limit below 3/4 of hash_mem. In that case, we are at > the > * minimum number of partitions, so we aren't going to dramatically > exceed > - * work mem anyway. > + * hash_mem anyway.
Can someone comment on this? Is the text change correct? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
