On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 12:27:58PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Do you have an answer to this question? Does anybody else? > > (My guts tell me it'd be better to change these routines to take > unsigned values, without creating extra variants. But guts frequently > misspeak.)
My guts are telling me as well to not have more variants. On top of that it seems to me that we'd want to rename any new routines to include "uint" in their name instead of "int", and for compatibility with past code pq_sendint should not be touched. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
