Hi, On 2023-11-02 10:46:52 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > So it sounds like we're in agreement that it is time to require LLVM > 10+ in master. Could the owners (CC'd) of the following animals > please turn off --with-llvm on master (and future 17+ branches), or > consider upgrading to a modern OS release? Otherwise they'll turn > red. > > And of course Andres would need to do the same for his coverage > animals in that range: > > animal | arch | llvm_version | os | os_release > | end_of_support > -------------+--------------------+--------------+--------+------------+---------------- > dragonet | x86_64 | 3.9.1 | Debian | sid | > phycodurus | x86_64 | 3.9.1 | Debian | sid | > desmoxytes | x86_64 | 4.0.1 | Debian | sid | > petalura | x86_64 | 4.0.1 | Debian | sid | > idiacanthus | x86_64 | 5.0.2 | Debian | sid | > pogona | x86_64 | 5.0.2 | Debian | sid | > komodoensis | x86_64 | 6.0.1 | Debian | sid | > xenodermus | x86_64 | 6.0.1 | Debian | sid |
Would you want me to do this now or just before you apply the patch? I think I should stand up a few more replacement animals to cover older llvm versions with assertions enabled... Greetings, Andres Freund
