Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:51 PM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There's some relevant discussion in
>> https://postgr.es/m/flat/20220602024243.GJ29853%40telsasoft.com
> It seems that the controversial '-Og' coupled with the old GCC version
> (4.8) makes it not worth fixing. So please ignore this thread.
Although nobody tried to enunciate a formal policy in the other thread,
I think where we ended up is that we'd consider suppressing warnings
seen with -Og, but only with reasonably-modern compiler versions.
For LTS compilers we are only going to care about warnings seen with
production flags (i.e., -O2 or better).
regards, tom lane
