On 2018-Jun-11, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > (2018/06/11 20:34), Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 06/11/2018 07:08 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > > > In one of those cases, "ConvertRowtypeExpr reference errors from > > > > partition-wise join", the patch has been marked Ready for Committer and > > > > then Etsuro seems to have changeed his mind. If it's not ready it should > > > > be set back to "needs review" or "waiting for author". > > > > > > Yeah, I don't think the proposed patch is the right way to go, so I'm > > > proposing another solution for that, which I think makes code much > > > simple, but I'd like to hear the opinion from Robert, who is the owner > > > of PWJ. (I marked this as Ready for Committer partly because I wanted > > > to hear the opinion.) > > > > I don't think that's the way we should use "Ready for Committer". I > > suggest you ,move it back to "Needs Review". > > Done.
Actually, for something that's an open item, there needn't be an entry in the commitfest at all, ISTM. Open items are must-fix for release (unlike older bugs), unless as a community we decide that something is not a bug or that it can go unfixed. So the commitfest entry is unnecessary. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services