Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 13:22 -0800, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>> But your argument of a nicer API might make a case for the patch.
> Yeah, that's what I was thinking. simplehash is newer and has a nicer
> API, so if we like it and want to move more code over, this is one
> step. But if we are fine using both hsearch.h and simplehash.h for
> overlapping use cases indefinitely, then I'll drop this.
I can't imagine wanting to convert *every* hashtable in the system
to simplehash; the added code bloat would be unreasonable. So yeah,
I think we'll have two mechanisms indefinitely. That's not to say
that we might not rewrite hsearch. But simplehash was never meant
to be a universal solution.
regards, tom lane
