Hi, > thread. I think you can compare the timing of regression tests in > subscription, with and without the patch to show there is no > regression. And probably some tests with a large number of tables for > sync with very little data.
I have tested the regression test timings for subscription with and without patch. I also did the timing test for sync of subscription with the publisher for 100 and 1000 tables respectively. I have attached the test script and results of the timing test are as follows: Time taken for test to run in Linux VM Summary | Subscription Test (sec) | 100 tables in pub and Sub (sec) | 1000 tables in pub and Sub (sec) Without patch Release | 95.564 | 7.877 | 58.919 With patch Release | 96.513 | 6.533 | 45.807 Time Taken for test to run in another Linux VM Summary | Subscription Test (sec) | 100 tables in pub and Sub (sec) | 1000 tables in pub and Sub (sec) Without patch Release | 109.8145 | 6.4675 | 83.001 With patch Release | 113.162 | 7.947 | 87.113 Time Taken for test to run in Performance Machine Linux Summary | Subscription Test (sec) | 100 tables in pub and Sub (sec) | 1000 tables in pub and Sub (sec) Without patch Release | 115.871 | 6.656 | 81.157 With patch Release | 115.922 | 6.7305 | 81.1525 thoughts? Thanks and Regards, Shlok Kyal
034_tmp.pl
Description: Binary data