On 2023-12-06 We 17:56, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:38 PM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:So the questions are: 1. Do those two formats work for the initial implementation? Yes. We provide a stream-oriented format and one atomic-import format. 2. Is the default correct or should it be switched e.g. rather than specifying FORCE_ARRAY to get an array, something like FORCE_NO_ARRAY to get JSON lines and the JSON array is default? No default? Require explicit of a sub-format when the main format is JSON. JSON_OBJECT_ROWS JSON_ARRAY_OF_OBJECTS For a future compact array-structured-composites sub-format: JSON_ARRAY_OF_ARRAYS JSON_ARRAY_ROWS
No default seems unlike the way we treat other COPY options. I'm not terribly fussed about which format to have as the default, but I think we should have one.
cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
