On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:36 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I don't think I believe this code change, let alone any of the > explanations for it. The point of these Asserts is to be sure that > we don't form an alleged parameterization set that includes any rels > that are included in the new join, because that would be obviously > wrong. They do check that as they stand. I'm not sure what invariant > the proposed revision would be enforcing.
Well, this explanation made sense to me: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMbWs4-%2BGs0HJ9ouBUb%3DqwHsGCXxG%2B92eJzLOpCkedvgtOWQ%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
