On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 15:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Is this enough of a bug to deserve back-patching? I'm not sure.
I like the patch, but I wouldn't back-patch it. I'd call the current behavior a slight inconsistency rather than an outright bug, and I think that we should be conservative with back-patching. Yours, Laurenz Albe
