On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:50:19AM +0700, Andrei Lepikhov wrote: > On 9/1/2024 00:16, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:53:17AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: >> > 2. FWIW, I'd like to call this whole feature "Support for named DSM >> > segments in Postgres". Do you see anything wrong with this? >> >> Why do you feel it should be renamed? I don't see anything wrong with it, >> but I also don't see any particular advantage with that name compared to >> "dynamic shared memory registry." > It is not a big issue, I suppose. But for me personally (as not a native > English speaker), the label "Named DSM segments" seems more straightforward > to understand.
That is good to know, thanks. I see that it would also align better with RequestNamedLWLockTranche/GetNamedLWLockTranche. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
