> On 17 Jan 2024, at 18:05, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: >> Hmm, how about raising an error if multiple options are given targetting >> the same GUC? > > I don't see any reason to do that. The underlying configuration > files don't complain about duplicate entries, they just take the > last setting.
Agreed, I think the patch as it stands now where it replaces case insensitive, while keeping the original casing, is the best path forward. The issue exist in 16 as well so I propose a backpatch to there. -- Daniel Gustafsson
