Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:58 AM Andy Fan <zhihuifan1...@163.com> wrote: >> I get your point! Acquiring an already held spinlock in quickdie is >> unlikely to happen, but since our existing infrastructure can handle it, >> then there is no reason to bypass it. > > No, the existing infrastructure cannot handle that at all. Actually I mean we can handle it without 0003. am I still wrong? Without the 0003, if we acquiring the spin lock which is held by ourself already. VerifyNoSpinLocksHeld in SpinLockAcquire should catch it. -- Best Regards Andy Fan
