On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 07:28, vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 00:24, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, hackers! > > In the measurements above in the thread, I've been using LIFO wake > > queue in a primary lockless patch (and it was attached as the previous > > versions of a patch) and an "inverted wake queue" (in faсt FIFO) as > > the alternative benchmarking option. I think using the latter is more > > fair and natural and provided they show no difference in the speed, > > I'd make the main patch using it (attached as v6). No other changes > > from v5, though. > > There has not been much interest on this as the thread has been idle > for more than a year now. I'm not sure if we should take it forward or > not. I would prefer to close this in the current commitfest unless > someone wants to take it further.
I have returned this patch in commitfest as nobody had shown any interest in pursuing it. Feel free to add a new entry when someone wants to work on this more actively. Regards, Vignesh