On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2018-06-01 17:15 GMT+02:00 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com > >: > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > postgres=# SELECT count(*) from data; >> > ┌─────────┐ >> > │ count │ >> > ╞═════════╡ >> > │ 1000000 │ >> > └─────────┘ >> > (1 row) >> > >> > \dt+ can display actual size of partitioned table data - now zero is >> > displayed >> > >> > postgres=# \dt+ data >> > List of relations >> > ┌────────┬──────┬───────┬───────┬─────────┬─────────────┐ >> > │ Schema │ Name │ Type │ Owner │ Size │ Description │ >> > ╞════════╪══════╪═══════╪═══════╪═════════╪═════════════╡ >> > │ public │ data │ table │ pavel │ 0 bytes │ │ >> > └────────┴──────┴───────┴───────┴─────────┴─────────────┘ >> > (1 row) >> >> I think we should at least display "Type" as "partitioned table" for a >> partitioned table, so that it's easy to understand why the size is 0; >> partitioned tables do not hold any data by themselves. >> > > should be. > > Yes, or maybe we can add that info in "Description". > Some is missing still - there is not any total size across all partitions. > > maybe new command like > > \dtP+ .. show partitioned tables and their size > +1 Regards, Jeevan Ladhe
