> > So now if we have such a functionality then it would be even better to > > extend it to selectively sync the slot. For example, if there is some > > issue in syncing all slots, maybe some bug or taking a long time to > > sync because there are a lot of slots but if the user needs to quickly > > failover and he/she is interested in only a couple of slots then such > > a option could be helpful. no? > > > > I see your point but not sure how useful it is in the field. I am fine > if others also think such a parameter will be useful and anyway I > think we can even extend it after v1 is done. >
Okay, I am fine with that. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com