Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
>> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I was, and remain, of the opinion that that was a bad idea that
>>> we'll eventually revert, just like we previously got rid of most
>>> inessential log chatter in the default configuration.
>> Unsurprisingly, I want to argue against that.
> I tend to agree with this position- log_checkpoints being on has been a
> recommended configuration for a very long time and is valuable
> information to have about what's been happening when someone does go and
> look at the log.
We turned on default log_checkpoints in v15, which means that behavior
has been in the field for about sixteen months. I don't think that
that gives it the status of a settled issue; my bet is that most
users still have not seen it.
regards, tom lane
