Hi, In <zcmidgkdsrz5i...@paquier.xyz> "Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:33:18 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Hmm. That explains why I was not seeing any differences with this > callback then. It seems to me that the order of actions to take is > clear, like: > - Revert 2889fd23be56 to keep a clean state of the tree, now done with > 1aa8324b81fa. Done. > - Dive into the strlen() issue, as it really looks like this can > create more simplifications for the patch discussed on this thread > with COPY TO. Done: b619852086ed2b5df76631f5678f60d3bebd3745 > - Revisit what we have here, looking at more profiles to see how HEAD > an v13 compare. It looks like we are on a good path, but let's tackle > things one step at a time. Are you already working on this? Do you want me to write the next patch based on the current master? Thanks, -- kou
