Hi,
In <CACJufxE=m8kMC92JpaqNMg02P_Pi1sZJ1w=xNec0=j_w6d9...@mail.gmail.com>
"Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on
Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:09:20 +0800,
jian he <jian.universal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My environment is slow (around 10x) but consistent.
> I see around 2-3 percent increase consistently.
> (with patch 7369.068 ms, without patch 7574.802 ms)
Thanks for sharing your numbers! It will help us to
determine whether these changes improve performance or not.
> the patchset looks good in my eyes, i can understand it.
> however I cannot apply it cleanly against the HEAD.
Hmm, I used 9bc1eee988c31e66a27e007d41020664df490214 as the
base version. But both patches based on the same
revision. So we may not be able to apply both patches at
once cleanly.
> +/*
> + * Prepare callinfo for InputFunctionCallSafeWithInfo to reuse one callinfo
> + * instead of initializing it for each call. This is for performance.
> + */
> +FunctionCallInfoBaseData *
> +PrepareInputFunctionCallInfo(void)
> +{
> + FunctionCallInfoBaseData *fcinfo;
> +
> + fcinfo = (FunctionCallInfoBaseData *) palloc(SizeForFunctionCallInfo(3));
>
> just wondering, I saw other similar places using palloc0,
> do we need to use palloc0?
I think that we don't need to use palloc0() here because the
following InitFunctionCallInfoData() call initializes all
members explicitly.
Thanks,
--
kou
