On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:08 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:36:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > You've indeed grabbed some historical inconsistencies here.  Please
> > note that your patch has reversed diffs (for example, the SQL
> > definition of pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea uses bytea,text,text as arguments
> > and your resulting patch shows how HEAD does the job with
> > bytea,bytea,bytea), but perhaps you have generated it with a command
> > like `git diff -R`?
>
> The reversed part of the patch put aside aside, I've double-checked
> your patch and the inconsistencies seem to be all addressed in this
> area.
Thanks for fixing and merging this patch, I appreciate it!

Thanks,
Shihao


> The symmetry that we have now between the bytea and text versions of
> the functions is stunning, but I cannot really get excited about
> merging all of them either as it would imply a bump of pgcrypto to
> update the prosrc of these functions, and we have to maintain runtime
> compatibility with older versions.
> --
> Michael


Reply via email to