On 2024-02-16 21:56:25 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 9:51 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I only skimmed the patch, but it sure looks to me that we could end up with > > none of the branches setting 31,32, so I think you'd have to make sure to > > handle that case. > > That case sets nulls[] for both of them to true I believe? And when > that is set I don't believe we need to set the values themselves.
Seems I skimmed too quickly :) - you're right.
