Hi,
I wanted to take a look at this patch but it seems to need a rebase,
because of a seemingly trivial conflict in MemoryContextMethodID:
--- src/include/utils/memutils_internal.h
+++ src/include/utils/memutils_internal.h
@@ -123,12 +140,13 @@ typedef enum MemoryContextMethodID
{
MCTX_UNUSED1_ID, /* 000 occurs in never-used memory */
MCTX_UNUSED2_ID, /* glibc malloc'd chunks usually match 001 */
- MCTX_UNUSED3_ID, /* glibc malloc'd chunks > 128kB match 010 */
+ MCTX_BUMP_ID, /* glibc malloc'd chunks > 128kB match 010
+ * XXX? */
MCTX_ASET_ID,
MCTX_GENERATION_ID,
MCTX_SLAB_ID,
MCTX_ALIGNED_REDIRECT_ID,
- MCTX_UNUSED4_ID /* 111 occurs in wipe_mem'd memory */
+ MCTX_UNUSED3_ID /* 111 occurs in wipe_mem'd memory */
} MemoryContextMethodID;
I wasn't paying much attention to these memcontext reworks in 2022, so
my instinct was simply to use one of those "UNUSED" IDs. But after
looking at the 80ef92675823 a bit more, are those IDs really unused? I
mean, we're relying on those values to detect bogus pointers, right? So
if we instead start using those values for a new memory context, won't
we lose the ability to detect those issues?
Maybe I'm completely misunderstanding the implication of those limits,
but doesn't this mean the claim that we can support 8 memory context
types is not quite true, and the limit is 4, because the 4 IDs are
already used for malloc stuff?
One thing that confuses me a bit is that the comments introduced by
80ef92675823 talk about glibc, but the related discussion in [1] talks a
lot about FreeBSD, NetBSD, ... which don't actually use glibc (AFAIK).
So how portable are those unused IDs, actually?
Or am I just too caffeine-deprived and missing something obvious?
regards
[1] https://postgr.es/m/2910981.1665080...@sss.pgh.pa.us
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
