On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 8:25 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some comments not related to the patch but to the existing code: > > --- > It might have already been discussed but is the > src/backend/replication/logical the right place for the slocsync.c? If > it's independent of logical decoding/replication, is under > src/backend/replication could be more appropriate? >
This point has not been discussed, so thanks for raising it. I think the reasoning behind keeping it in logical is that this file contains a code for logical slot syncing and a worker doing that. As it is mostly about logical slot syncing so there is an argument to keep it under logical. In the future, we may need to extend this functionality to have a per-db slot sync worker as well in which case it will probably be again somewhat related to logical slots. Having said that, there is an argument to keep it under replication as well because the functionality it provides is for physical standbys. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
