On Friday, February 23, 2024 10:02 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 
<houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Since the slotsync worker patch has been committed, I rebased the remaining
> patches.
> And here is the V95 patch set.
> 
> Also, I fixed a bug in the current 0001 patch where the member of the standby
> slot names list pointed to the freed memory after calling ProcessConfigFile().
> Now, we will obtain a new list when we call ProcessConfigFile(). The
> optimization to only get the new list when the names actually change has been
> removed. I think this change is acceptable because ProcessConfigFile is not a
> frequent occurrence.
> 
> Additionally, I reordered the tests in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl. Now
> the new test will be conducted after the sync slot test to prevent the risk 
> of the
> logical slot occasionally not catching up to the latest catalog_xmin and, as a
> result, not being able to be synced immediately.

There is one unexpected change in the previous version, sorry for that.
Here is the correct version.

Best Regards,
Hou zj

Attachment: v95_2-0002-Document-the-steps-to-check-if-the-standby-is-r.patch
Description: v95_2-0002-Document-the-steps-to-check-if-the-standby-is-r.patch

Attachment: v95_2-0001-Allow-logical-walsenders-to-wait-for-the-physic.patch
Description: v95_2-0001-Allow-logical-walsenders-to-wait-for-the-physic.patch

Reply via email to