On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:46 AM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 08:42, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > To resolve the BF > > > failure, I still feel, we should just recreate the subscription. This > > > is a pre-existing problem and we can track it via a separate patch > > > with a test case targetting such failures. > > > > +1 for going with recreation of the subscription, the changes for this > > are available at [1]. > > [1] - > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1hLZW4H4Z61swK6WPW6pcNcjzXqw%3D6NqG7e-RMtkFaZA%40mail.gmail.com > > > > Tom, and others, does anyone still object to going ahead with an idea > by just changing the test to recreate the subscription to silence BF > failures for this test? >
Seeing no objections, I have pushed the required test changes to silence the BF. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
