Thanks for commit. I have verified reported case. it is fixed now. Thanks & Regards, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi QMG, EnterpriseDB Corporation
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:38 AM, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 22 June 2018 at 03:30, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I think some coverage of the numerical aggregates is a good idea, so > >> I've added some in the attached. I managed to get a parallel plan > >> going with a query to onek, which is pretty cheap to execute. I didn't > >> touch the bool aggregates. Maybe I should have done that too..? > > > > This sort of blunderbuss testing was exactly what I *didn't* want to do. > > Not only is this adding about 20x as many cycles as we need (at least for > > this specific numeric_poly_combine issue), but I'm quite afraid that the > > float4 and/or float8 cases will show low-order-digit irreproducibility > > in the buildfarm. > > okay. My sniper rifle was locked away for the evening. I decided it > was best to sleep before any careful aiming was required. > > I see you've done the deed already. Thanks. > > -- > David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services >
