On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:41 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2024-03-05 16:41:30 +0700, John Naylor wrote: > > I'd like to push 0001 and 0002 shortly, and then do another sweep over > > 0003, with remaining feedback, and get that in so we get some > > buildfarm testing before the remaining polishing work on > > tidstore/vacuum. > > A few ARM buildfarm animals are complaining: > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A02 > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=snakefly&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A03 > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=massasauga&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A33%3A18 >
The error message we got is: ../../src/include/port/simd.h:326:71: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of \342\200\230vshrq_n_s8\342\200\231 uint8x16_t masked = vandq_u8(vld1q_u8(mask), (uint8x16_t) vshrq_n_s8(v, 7)); ^ Since 'v' is uint8x16_t I think we should have used vshrq_n_u8() instead. Regard, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com