Hello Nathan,

08.03.2024 01:00, Nathan Bossart wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 12:00:01PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
So I would not say that it's a dominant failure for now, and given that
04a09ee lives in master only, maybe we can save two commits (Revert +
Revert of revert) while moving to a more persistent solution.
I just checked in on this one to see whether we needed to create an "open
item" for v17.  While I'm not seeing the failures anymore, the patch that
Alexander claimed should fix it [0] doesn't appear to have been committed,
either.  Perhaps this was fixed by something else...

[0] 
https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGL0bikWSC2XW-zUgFWNVEpD_gEWXndi2PE5tWqmApkpZQ%40mail.gmail.com

I have re-run the tests and found out that the issue was fixed by
d3c5f37dd. It changed the inner of the loop "while (PQisBusy(conn))",
formerly contained in pgfdw_get_result() as follows:
                /* Data available in socket? */
                if (wc & WL_SOCKET_READABLE)
                {
                    if (!PQconsumeInput(conn))
                        pgfdw_report_error(ERROR, NULL, conn, false, query);
                }
->
        /* Consume whatever data is available from the socket */
        if (PQconsumeInput(conn) == 0)
        {
            /* trouble; expect PQgetResult() to return NULL */
            break;
        }

That is, the unconditional "if PQconsumeInput() ..." eliminates the test
timeout.

Best regards,
Alexander


Reply via email to