On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 4:08 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The patch-of-record contains no such wording.
I plan to fix that, if nobody else beats me to it. > And if this isn't a > security feature, then what is it? If you have to say to your > (super) users "please don't mess with the system configuration", > you might as well just trust them not to do it the easy way as not > to do it the hard way. If they're untrustworthy, why have they > got superuser? I mean, I feel like this question has been asked and answered before, multiple times, on this thread. If you sincerely don't understand the use case, I can try again to explain it. But somehow I feel like it's more that you just don't like the idea, which is fair, but it seems like a considerable number of people feel otherwise. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
