I am planning to push the bufmgr.c patch soon.  At that point the new
API won't have any direct callers yet, but the traditional
ReadBuffer() family of functions will internally reach
StartReadBuffers(nblocks=1) followed by WaitReadBuffers(),
ZeroBuffer() or nothing as appropriate.  Any more thoughts or
objections?  Naming, semantics, correctness of buffer protocol,
sufficiency of comments, something else?


Reply via email to