Le 25/06/2018 à 22:32, Stephen Frost a écrit :
Greetings

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 15:57 Don Seiler <d...@seiler.us <mailto:d...@seiler.us>> wrote:

    On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Gilles Darold
    <gilles.dar...@dalibo.com <mailto:gilles.dar...@dalibo.com>> wrote:

        I would prefer the following output to conform to elog.c output:

            2018-06-25 17:32:46.854 CEST [23265] LOG: connection
        authorized: user=postgres database=postgres application=[unknown]

    Hello Gilles,

    The different cases were for Stephen's request earlier in this
    thread. I'm happy to write it either way and agree it would be
    nice to not have a lot of duplicate code. Do you want me to submit
    another patch?


I think it’s better to not change the line when application name isn’t being set, as the latest patch has. That also matches how we handle the SSL info- it’s only shown if ssl is in place on the connection.

Oh ok, sorry Stephen I've not seen your anwser before my last reply. I would prefer to have the information that the application_name is unknown but this is just to conform with the log parser and obviously the actual patch is enough, I change the status to "ready for committer", nothing need to be change.

--
Gilles Darold
Consultant PostgreSQL
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org

Reply via email to