On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:30 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:49:12PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> In the same vein, I think deactivated_at or inactive_since might be > >> good names to consider. I think they get at the same thing as > >> released_time, but they avoid introducing a completely new word > >> (release, as opposed to active/inactive). > > > > Yeah, I'd vote for inactive_since then. > > Having only skimmed some of the related discussions, I'm inclined to agree > that inactive_since provides the clearest description for the column.
I think we all have some agreement on inactive_since. So, I'm attaching the patch for that change. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
v1-0001-Use-a-less-confusing-name-for-slot-s-last_inactiv.patch
Description: Binary data
