On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 5:42 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postg...@jeltef.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 10:24, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postg...@jeltef.nl> wrote:
> > I addressed them all I think. Mostly the small changes that were
> > suggested, but I rewrote the sentence with "might be discarded". And I
> > added references to the new GUC in both places suggested by David.
>
> Changed the error hint to use "external tool" too. And removed a
> duplicate header definition of AllowAlterSystem (I moved it to guc.h
> so it was together with other definitions a few patches ago, but
> apparently forgot to remove it from guc_tables.h)
I disagree with a lot of these changes. I think the old version was
mostly better. But I can live with a lot of it if it makes other
people happy. However:
+ Which might result in unintended behavior, such as the external tool
+ discarding the change at some later point in time when it updates the
+ configuration.
This is not OK from a grammatical point of view. You can't just start
a sentence with "which" like this. You could replace "Which" with
"This", though.
+ if (!AllowAlterSystem)
+ {
+
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
+ errmsg("ALTER SYSTEM is not allowed in this environment"),
+ errhint("Global configuration changes should be made using an
external tool, not by using ALTER SYSTEM.")));
+ }
The extra blank line should go. The brackets should go. And I think
the errhint should go, too, because the errhint implies that we know
why the user chose to set allow_alter_system=false. There's no reason
for this message to be opinionated about that.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
