> On 8 Aug 2023, at 12:31, John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> > > Also the shared counter is the cause of the slowdown, but not the reason
> > > for the numeric limit.
> >
> > Isn't it both? typedef Oid is unsigned int = 2^32, and according to
> > GetNewOidWithIndex() logic if we exhaust the whole OID space it will hang
> > indefinitely which has the same semantics as "being impossible"/permanent
> > hang (?)
>
> Looking again, I'm thinking the OID type size is more relevant for the first
> paragraph, and the shared/global aspect is more relevant for the second.
>
> The last issue is how to separate the notes at the bottom, since there are
> now two topics.
Jakub, do you have plans to address this feedback? Is the CF entry still
relevant?
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
