Alexander Lakhin <exclus...@gmail.com> writes: > I think that deviation can be explained by the fact that cost_index() takes > baserel->allvisfrac (derived from pg_class.relallvisible) into account for > the index-only-scan case, and I see the following difference when a test > run fails: > relname | relpages | reltuples | relallvisible | indisvalid | > autovacuum_count | autoanalyze_count > > ----------------------+----------+-----------+---------------+------------+------------------+------------------- > - tenk1 | 345 | 10000 | 345 | | > 0 | 0 > + tenk1 | 345 | 10000 | 305 | | > 0 | 0
Ouch. So what's triggering that? The intention of test_setup surely is to provide a uniform starting point. regards, tom lane