On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I think we should take the hint in the comments and make it O(1) > anyway. See attached draft patch.
Alternatively, here is a shorter and sweeter dlist version (I did the open-coded one thinking of theoretical back-patchability). -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
0001-Use-a-dlist-for-unowned-relations.patch
Description: Binary data
