> On 4 Apr 2024, at 00:06, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: >> On 3 Apr 2024, at 19:38, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Bottom line for me is that pulling 1.0.1 support now is OK, >>> but I think pulling 1.0.2 is premature. > >> Is Red Hat building and and shipping v17 packages for RHEL7 ELS customers? >> If >> not then it seems mostly academical to tie our dependencies to RHEL ELS >> unless >> I'm missing something. > > True, they won't be doing that, and neither will Devrim. So maybe > we can leave RHEL7 out of the discussion, in which case there's > not a lot of reason to keep 1.0.2 support. We'll need to notify > buildfarm owners to adjust their configurations.
The patch will also need to be adjusted to work with LibreSSL, but I know Jacob was looking into that so ideally we should have something to review before the weekend. -- Daniel Gustafsson
