On 2018-06-28 11:14:38 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I'm not sure pgsql-committers was the right audience. Cross-posting to > pg-hackers. > > On 2018-Jun-28, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > 2 Reported-by: > > 5 Author: > > 6 Reviewed-by: > > 7 Tested-by: > > Should these include email addresses?
I'm not sure it's that helpful, they tend to be out of date pretty soon. > I've also used "Diagnosed-by" to credit a person who spent time studying > a bug's mechanism and how to fix it. Sometimes that's the same as > Reported-by, but I think the weight is quite different. Yea, same here. > Apparently, there's a recent trend to credit patch authors using > "Co-authored-by". Should we use that too? > https://stackoverflow.com/a/41847267/ I just put multiple people into Authors, with order roughly implying the amount of work. Don't really see a reason to split it off further? Greetings, Andres Freund
