Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2024-04-18 23:11:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I was just looking locally at what I got by removing that, and sadly
>> I don't think I believe it: there are a lot of places where it claims
>> we hit lines we don't, and vice versa. That might be partially
>> blamable on old tools on my RHEL8 workstation, but it sure seems
>> that flex output confuses lcov to some extent.
> Hm. Here it mostly looks reasonable, except that at least things seem off by
> 1.
Yeah, now that you mention it what I'm seeing looks like the line
numbering might be off-by-one. Time for a bug report?
regards, tom lane
