On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:13 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> yesterday, I had to fix strange issue on standby server
>
> The query to freshly updated data fails
>
> select * from seller_success_rate where create_time::date = '2024-04-23';
> ERROR: 58P01: could not access status of transaction 1393466389
> DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_xact/0530": No such file or directory.
> LOCATION: SlruReportIOError, slru.c:947
>
> amcheck
>
> select * from verify_heapam('seller_success_rate');
> blkno | offnum | attnum | msg
> -------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5763 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 5863 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 5863 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 5868 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 5868 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 5875 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 5895 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 5895 | 110 | | xmin 1439564642 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6245 | 108 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6245 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6245 | 110 | | xmin 1439564642 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6245 | 112 | | xmin 1424677216 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6378 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6378 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6382 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6590 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 6590 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 7578 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 7581 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 8390 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 10598 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
> 10598 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction
> ID 3:1523885078
>
> I verified xmin against the primary server, and it was the same. There was
> not any replication gap.
>
> I checked the fields from pg_database table, and looks same too
>
> These rows were valid (and visible) on primary.
>
> On this server there was not any long session (when I was connected),
> unfortunately I cannot test restart of this server. One wal sender is
> executing on standby. Fortunately, there was a possibility to run VACUUM
> FULL, and it fixed the issue.
>
> The customer has archived wals.
Did you mention what version of Postgres this is?
- Melanie
