On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 05:22:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: >> IIUC this would cause other sessions' temporary sequences to appear in the >> view. Is that desirable? > > I assume Michael meant to move the test into the C code, not drop > it entirely --- I agree we don't want that.
Yup. I meant to remove it from the script and keep only something in the C code to avoid the duplication, but you're right that the temp sequences would create more noise than now. > Moving it has some attraction, but pg_is_other_temp_schema() is also > used in a lot of information_schema views, so we couldn't get rid of > it without a lot of further hacking. Not sure we want to relocate > that filter responsibility in just one view. Okay. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
