On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Finally, if the foreign key has a PERIOD column_name specification > > > the corresponding refcolumn, if present, must also be marked > > > PERIOD. If the refcolumn clause is omitted, and thus the reftable's > > > primary key constraint chosen, the primary key must have its final > > > column marked WITHOUT OVERLAPS. > > > > Yes, David is correct here on all points. I like his suggestion to > > clarify the language here also. If you need a patch from me let me know, > > but I assume it's something a committer can just make happen? > > In principle yes, but it's also very helpful if someone produces an actual > patch file, with complete commit message, credits, mailing list link, etc.
I am ready to do the work, but waited a day for Peter to reply, since he was the author of the text. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
