Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> An alternative would be to create a special branch within the core
>> repo for such data, something like this (The first two lines are the
>> ones that are most important):
>> ...
>> The new branch won't share any history or files with the existing branches.
> Seems like too much magic to me.
Dunno, I was wondering yesterday whether something like that would be
possible. It'd be easier to maintain than a separate repo, for sure.
I wonder what that would look like in gitweb, though. If the website
treated it like a version branch, it'd likely be weird.
regards, tom lane
