Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:45:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> ... I think the enum should be nuked altogether, but >> it's a bit late to be redesigning that for v17 perhaps.
> You're right, WaitEventExtension is better gone. The only thing that > matters is that we want to start computing the IDs assigned to the > custom wait events for extensions with a number higher than the > existing WAIT_EXTENSION to avoid interferences in pg_stat_activity, so > this could be cleaned up as the attached. WFM, and this is probably a place where we don't want to change the API in v17 and again in v18, so I agree with pushing now. Reminder though: beta1 release freeze begins Saturday. Not many hours left. regards, tom lane